How to Control Pornography Illustrator Art Work

World best phone number list forum
Post Reply
Ahad
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2022 6:11 am

How to Control Pornography Illustrator Art Work

Post by Ahad »

Just when Tsai Ing-wen was inaugurated as the second president on 520, when everyone's eyes were focused on Tsai Ing-wen's inaugural speech and the Chinese government's reaction; "Apple Daily" published a report on the Legislative Yuan " Damn! Cai Yiyu objected to the addition of a whistle-blowing system in the Criminal Law, saying that "some subcultures like to be seen by their private parts" . " The topic of this report is the proposal of Legislator Wu Yiding, which hopes to add a whistleblower mechanism and reward for whistleblowers for "distributing, broadcasting, and selling obscene images, texts, and videos." This proposal was opposed by legislator Cai Yiyu. Cai Yiyu believes that there is room for ambiguity in the determination of "obscenity", so the mechanism for victim reporting should be returned. Apple's report also quoted a statement from Cai Yiyu: Some people like to be seen privately, how can such a subculture say it's wrong? Judging from the many elements mentioned in this report,

one would feel that Cai Yiyu's objection is to exonerate the "perverts" who like to watch pornographic pictures. The reason why Wu Yiding proposed to amend the law is to prevent Taiwan from repeating the "Nth Room Incident" in South Korea. This motive sounds well-intentioned. Wouldn't it be too late to wait until the victim is reported? Of course, the whole people must be mobilized to report together to stifle the possibility of crime from the source. As for the fact that some people like to be seen in their private parts, just listening to them will feel like they are talking nonsense at all, Illustrator Art Work
and it is no wonder that "Apple Daily" will make such a bid. However, is Cai Yiyu's opposition really so "nonsense"? Discussing the error of pornography with 'obscene' First of all, according to Wu Yiding's proposal, the standard of reporting is "obscenity", but molestation is a judging standard based on the values ​​of "kindness and customs" in the last century. Now when you open FB and IG, you can see that many men and women are generously showing their arms, long legs, pectoral muscles and small waists in the photos. These pictures, texts, videos,

and videos that we see according to three meals and feel ordinary, according to the past "kindness" The standard of "customs" are all completely "obscene" pictures. In his " Little Miscellaneous Senses ", Lu Xun described how the "kindness custom" of the last century thought: At the sight of short sleeves, I immediately think of white arms, immediately I think of full nudity, immediately I think of genitals, immediately I think of sexual intercourse, immediately I think of interbreeding, and immediately I think of bastards. The Chinese imagination can only make such a leap at this level. Although standing in the mainstream perception of today's society, Cai Yiyu's words that "some people like to be seen private parts" are ridiculous, but if the standards of the early 2000s are met, the beautiful photos of "male gods and goddesses" showing their bodies on the modern Internet will also All of them are obscene pictures of "God Pulling". Let's look at the "Free the Nipple movement" that was popular in Europe and the United States a few years ago. Although Cai Yiyu's words omitted too many contexts, is it really so ridiculous?
Post Reply